<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet Another Reason Why OS X Proper On The Tablet Would Be Nice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/07/28/yet-another-reason-why-os-x-proper-on-the-tablet-would-be-nice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/07/28/yet-another-reason-why-os-x-proper-on-the-tablet-would-be-nice/</link>
	<description>Entertainment and Tech Digest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcieplinski</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/07/28/yet-another-reason-why-os-x-proper-on-the-tablet-would-be-nice/comment-page-1/#comment-30888</link>
		<dc:creator>jcieplinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/?p=5267#comment-30888</guid>
		<description>Exactly. There are all kinds of reasons not to do a tablet. But there were all kinds of reasons not to do a phone or a music player, too. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This could very well have a strong link to the Apple TV. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the change of all metal laptops to MacBook Pro definitely has something to do with this new product&#039;s place in the lineup. It would at least hint at a price point (somewhere between $400 and $900) and at the audience (consumers). So our dreams of doing Photoshop on this thing may be unrealistic. Maybe it&#039;s really targeted at the people who are now buying netbooks—people who simply want to get on the web and do email and word documents on the road. Personally, I think the iPhone covers that ground perfectly for me. But I may not be the target for this product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. There are all kinds of reasons not to do a tablet. But there were all kinds of reasons not to do a phone or a music player, too. </p>
<p>This could very well have a strong link to the Apple TV. </p>
<p>I think the change of all metal laptops to MacBook Pro definitely has something to do with this new product’s place in the lineup. It would at least hint at a price point (somewhere between $400 and $900) and at the audience (consumers). So our dreams of doing Photoshop on this thing may be unrealistic. Maybe it’s really targeted at the people who are now buying netbooks—people who simply want to get on the web and do email and word documents on the road. Personally, I think the iPhone covers that ground perfectly for me. But I may not be the target for this product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/07/28/yet-another-reason-why-os-x-proper-on-the-tablet-would-be-nice/comment-page-1/#comment-30887</link>
		<dc:creator>webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/?p=5267#comment-30887</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it definitely still sounds crazy.  Perhaps some of our grasping is the&lt;br&gt;idea that Apple has some uber master plan in the works - as in, the reason&lt;br&gt;why the Apple TV has not seen a major update in some time, or why the&lt;br&gt;portables are all called &quot;MacBook Pro&quot; is because this tablet has some&lt;br&gt;overlap with the Apple TV and MacBook. But probably, not.&lt;br&gt;At this point I just must have faith that Apple has some angle on this that&lt;br&gt;none of us have thought of yet. Maybe it&#039;s the return of the Newton...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it definitely still sounds crazy.  Perhaps some of our grasping is the<br />idea that Apple has some uber master plan in the works — as in, the reason<br />why the Apple TV has not seen a major update in some time, or why the<br />portables are all called “MacBook Pro” is because this tablet has some<br />overlap with the Apple TV and MacBook. But probably, not.<br />At this point I just must have faith that Apple has some angle on this that<br />none of us have thought of yet. Maybe it’s the return of the Newton…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcieplinski</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/07/28/yet-another-reason-why-os-x-proper-on-the-tablet-would-be-nice/comment-page-1/#comment-30886</link>
		<dc:creator>jcieplinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/?p=5267#comment-30886</guid>
		<description>The &quot;lockdown&quot; of software in the App store has two major benefits. 1)For developers, it practically guarantees that apps won&#039;t be pirated. 2)That in turn allows developers to charge far less per app. So we get apps much more cheaply than we ordinarily would, and developers make plenty of money selling at a lower unit price and reaching a much bigger audience. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Adobe has screamed for years that Photoshop would be $100 if 70% of people didn&#039;t pirate it and pay them nothing. The App Store is proving that would work, at least in theory. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as this tablet goes, I trust Apple to be smart enough to know what will work or not. Personally, I still can&#039;t see ANY advantage of a tablet over a laptop like the Air. But there has to be some new market for this thing beyond the tech geeks who have been clamoring for it for ages. Otherwise, Apple wouldn&#039;t bother creating it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Full OS X sounds like a great idea. The only problem I foresee with that is that OS X wasn&#039;t meant to be navigated with your fingers. There are far too many small target areas that need to be clicked. And we all know how Steve Jobs feels about the idea of a stylus, so I don&#039;t think it&#039;s likely that we&#039;ll be using a stylus with this thing. But you never know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some sort of hybrid? An entirely new UI built on top of OS X? Could be, but that sounds crazy, too. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This whole project sounds crazy to me. So I&#039;m just going to sit back and let Apple explain it to me when the time comes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The “lockdown” of software in the App store has two major benefits. 1)For developers, it practically guarantees that apps won’t be pirated. 2)That in turn allows developers to charge far less per app. So we get apps much more cheaply than we ordinarily would, and developers make plenty of money selling at a lower unit price and reaching a much bigger audience. </p>
<p>Adobe has screamed for years that Photoshop would be $100 if 70% of people didn’t pirate it and pay them nothing. The App Store is proving that would work, at least in theory. </p>
<p>As far as this tablet goes, I trust Apple to be smart enough to know what will work or not. Personally, I still can’t see ANY advantage of a tablet over a laptop like the Air. But there has to be some new market for this thing beyond the tech geeks who have been clamoring for it for ages. Otherwise, Apple wouldn’t bother creating it. </p>
<p>Full OS X sounds like a great idea. The only problem I foresee with that is that OS X wasn’t meant to be navigated with your fingers. There are far too many small target areas that need to be clicked. And we all know how Steve Jobs feels about the idea of a stylus, so I don’t think it’s likely that we’ll be using a stylus with this thing. But you never know.</p>
<p>Some sort of hybrid? An entirely new UI built on top of OS X? Could be, but that sounds crazy, too. </p>
<p>This whole project sounds crazy to me. So I’m just going to sit back and let Apple explain it to me when the time comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

