<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple + Twitter? No</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/05/05/apple-twitter-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/05/05/apple-twitter-no/</link>
	<description>Entertainment and Tech Digest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT Certification Training</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/05/05/apple-twitter-no/comment-page-1/#comment-30310</link>
		<dc:creator>IT Certification Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/?p=5054#comment-30310</guid>
		<description>even i dont think apple has got to do anything with twitter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even i dont think apple has got to do anything with twitter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PacificGatePost</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/05/05/apple-twitter-no/comment-page-1/#comment-30309</link>
		<dc:creator>PacificGatePost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/?p=5054#comment-30309</guid>
		<description>As much as the rumor mill is pushing the Twitter acquisition story, it flies in the face of common sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/05/common-sense-apple-will-not-twitter.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/05/com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apple is NOT eBay.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Going all the way back to ’81 when Apple established an alliance of sorts with Logo Computer Systems for the Logo programming language that solidified Apple’s position in the world of education, the hardware manufacturer has a history of establishing effective relationships to solidify its market presence. Spending $700 million on Twitter doesn’t fit that blueprint</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as the rumor mill is pushing the Twitter acquisition story, it flies in the face of common sense.</p>
<p><a href="http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/05/common-sense-apple-will-not-twitter.html" rel="nofollow">http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/05/com…</a></p>
<p>Apple is NOT eBay.</p>
<p>Going all the way back to ’81 when Apple established an alliance of sorts with Logo Computer Systems for the Logo programming language that solidified Apple’s position in the world of education, the hardware manufacturer has a history of establishing effective relationships to solidify its market presence. Spending $700 million on Twitter doesn’t fit that blueprint</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Corral &#8230; a deluge of rumor crap — Shooting at Bubbles</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/05/05/apple-twitter-no/comment-page-1/#comment-30304</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Corral &#8230; a deluge of rumor crap — Shooting at Bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 02:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/?p=5054#comment-30304</guid>
		<description>[...] list was TwitterTechCrunch with a total of three posts on this stupid ass rumor. Thankfully not everyone lost their heads in all this stupidity and actually saw it for the linkbait it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] list was TwitterTechCrunch with a total of three posts on this stupid ass rumor. Thankfully not everyone lost their heads in all this stupidity and actually saw it for the linkbait it […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcieplinski</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/05/05/apple-twitter-no/comment-page-1/#comment-30303</link>
		<dc:creator>jcieplinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/?p=5054#comment-30303</guid>
		<description>Microsoft buying Twitter makes absolute sense. They are fond of buying companies with a buzz, just to make it look like they have a handle on whatever new hot trends arrive on the scene. Microsoft is all about the amazing product they&#039;re going to release two years from now. But that product never seems to materialize. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And they have scores of divisions within the company that bleed money every month. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I only hope this doesn&#039;t happen, though, because I like Twitter, and I see any company that gets acquired by MSoft these days as a soon-to-be-dead company. This is the same reason I opposed the purchase of Yahoo!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Microsoft is the past. It has no future. It is the Great Britain of the computer industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft buying Twitter makes absolute sense. They are fond of buying companies with a buzz, just to make it look like they have a handle on whatever new hot trends arrive on the scene. Microsoft is all about the amazing product they’re going to release two years from now. But that product never seems to materialize. </p>
<p>And they have scores of divisions within the company that bleed money every month. </p>
<p>I only hope this doesn’t happen, though, because I like Twitter, and I see any company that gets acquired by MSoft these days as a soon-to-be-dead company. This is the same reason I opposed the purchase of Yahoo!</p>
<p>Microsoft is the past. It has no future. It is the Great Britain of the computer industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/05/05/apple-twitter-no/comment-page-1/#comment-30302</link>
		<dc:creator>webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/?p=5054#comment-30302</guid>
		<description>Yeah... anybody who has observed Apple&#039;s modus operandi for more than a year&lt;br&gt;and does even the smallest amount of research could see this rumor is&lt;br&gt;ridiculous.&lt;br&gt;I still think someone will purchase Twitter, but it will be a company with a&lt;br&gt;past history of a hype-driven move: Microsoft, Google, Yahoo!, etc. It won&#039;t&lt;br&gt;be Apple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Zune + Twitter. Now that&#039;s a rumor I&#039;d believe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah… anybody who has observed Apple’s modus operandi for more than a year<br />and does even the smallest amount of research could see this rumor is<br />ridiculous.<br />I still think someone will purchase Twitter, but it will be a company with a<br />past history of a hype-driven move: Microsoft, Google, Yahoo!, etc. It won’t<br />be Apple.</p>
<p>Zune + Twitter. Now that’s a rumor I’d believe…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcieplinski</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2009/05/05/apple-twitter-no/comment-page-1/#comment-30301</link>
		<dc:creator>jcieplinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/?p=5054#comment-30301</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more. Not to mention, every article on this rumor goes out of its way to say that its sources are completely unverified. In other words, someone completely pulled this one out of his butt. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And it really does make no sense. Every division of Apple is profitable. Even when Apple gives away an app, like iPhoto, that app still generates revenue via photo print and photo book sales. Even Garageband now sells music lessons. There&#039;s always some sort of revenue stream from just about everything they do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter, no matter how good an idea it is, no matter how many Oprah&#039;s and Aston Kusher&#039;s sign up, has no business model whatsoever. It functions purely on venture capital. That&#039;s not the Apple way of doing things. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unless someone at Apple has figured out some brilliant way to make money off twitter that no one else has, this is never going to happen. And to be honest, I don&#039;t know how anyone could make money off of twitter. You can&#039;t attach ads to tweets, and you can&#039;t charge people subscription fees, because they&#039;d all just quit using it. It&#039;s a dead-end business. Maybe someone like Google or Facebook could incorporate it into a larger overall social media strategy, and run it at a loss in order to enhance the big picture. But Apple has no need for that, and more importantly, no history of ever doing something like that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter should have jumped on the Facebook deal while it had the chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn’t agree more. Not to mention, every article on this rumor goes out of its way to say that its sources are completely unverified. In other words, someone completely pulled this one out of his butt. </p>
<p>And it really does make no sense. Every division of Apple is profitable. Even when Apple gives away an app, like iPhoto, that app still generates revenue via photo print and photo book sales. Even Garageband now sells music lessons. There’s always some sort of revenue stream from just about everything they do.</p>
<p>Twitter, no matter how good an idea it is, no matter how many Oprah’s and Aston Kusher’s sign up, has no business model whatsoever. It functions purely on venture capital. That’s not the Apple way of doing things. </p>
<p>Unless someone at Apple has figured out some brilliant way to make money off twitter that no one else has, this is never going to happen. And to be honest, I don’t know how anyone could make money off of twitter. You can’t attach ads to tweets, and you can’t charge people subscription fees, because they’d all just quit using it. It’s a dead-end business. Maybe someone like Google or Facebook could incorporate it into a larger overall social media strategy, and run it at a loss in order to enhance the big picture. But Apple has no need for that, and more importantly, no history of ever doing something like that.</p>
<p>Twitter should have jumped on the Facebook deal while it had the chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

