Comments on: Rumor: Yahoo! Merging With AOL?

By: The Google Story Isn’t Over Yet » Webomatica - Technology and Entertainment Digest

Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:10:09 +0000

[...] an opportunity to grab market share from their flagging competitors, namely Microsoft and Yahoo! (we know how they’ve been distracted over the past few months) and emerge from the recession stronger than [...]

By: unTECHy

unTECHy — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 04:51:07 +0000

I hate it when huge corporations merge. Pretty soon the world will just be 1 big corporation. And it will probably be ran by George W! LOL

By: papa

papa — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:28:32 +0000

That MySpace wrinkle is a really interesting one.

I'm also amused by the fact that Google bought a stake in AOL (a year ago?) and MSFT has that stake in Facebook. Everyone has their fingers in so many pies….it makes for some interesting combinations/alliances as you mix and match the various pieces in the puzzle.

By: webomatica

webomatica — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:59:09 +0000

Good points. I think that long-term / short-term issue for shareholders is a huge one. If you think Yahoo! management is competent enough to manage a merger with AOL, vs. their mismanagement is part of the problem, and they deserve to be bought / replaced.

Now there's this added wrinkle of News corp "changing sides" and siding with Microsoft - meaning if Yahoo! goes Microsoft they could get access to MySpace.

I wonder which will wrap up sooner - YHOO / MSFT or Hilary / Obama?

I really hope YHOOs earnings (real soon now) provide an impetus for action one way or another. It could be that this AOL merger business is just a negotiating tactic to get MSFT to raise their bid. And earnings will be the proof of Yahoo!s worth at this point in time.

By: papa

papa — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:13:19 +0000

Interesting. I'm not too bullish on an AOL/Yahoo merger, but I suppose it has *some* merit.

* It would solidify Yahoo's ambitions on the middle-America crowd (both Yahoo and AOL have been abandoned - to some extent - by the technorati/bleeding edge), but there is still a big pack of mainstream users that are using these services and still valuable to advertisers

* The 2 companies have been pursuing in-house content strategies that *might* complement each other (think Yahoo's "Shine" and AOL's popular TMZ). Granted Google's been whipping both companies with a distinctly different strategy, but by going the content route, and avoiding the search/adsense competition, they could get out of the direct gunsights of "THE GOOGLE"

* It's not hotmail/yahoomail, but both have significant email and im audiences. There might be something nice there.

* I rarely go to AOL.com, but I just did for kicks and I'll be damned if their homepage doesn't look almost identical to the Yahoo one! (see for yourself). That's synergy baby!

Anyway, I'm grasping at straws here. The big question is: if I'm a large shareholder, which future is sounding better to my wallet? If I'm patient, maybe the AOL/Yahoo deal is sounding good. But if I'm not, the certainty of the MSFT offer sounds damned good in the short-term...and one has to think that a MSFT/Yahoo combo still sounds more potent long-term than an AOL/Yahoo combo (despite anyone's misgivings about Ballmer and the "evil empire").