<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking A Step Back From OpenSocial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/11/03/taking-a-step-back-from-opensocial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/11/03/taking-a-step-back-from-opensocial/</link>
	<description>Entertainment and Tech Digest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Kohler</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/11/03/taking-a-step-back-from-opensocial/comment-page-1/#comment-18858</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 21:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/11/03/taking-a-step-back-from-opensocial/#comment-18858</guid>
		<description>Great point that this is still speculation. I don&#039;t understand how much control this, as a consumer, will really give me over my data from one social networking type site to the next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point that this is still speculation. I don’t understand how much control this, as a consumer, will really give me over my data from one social networking type site to the next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/11/03/taking-a-step-back-from-opensocial/comment-page-1/#comment-18841</link>
		<dc:creator>webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 05:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/11/03/taking-a-step-back-from-opensocial/#comment-18841</guid>
		<description>I do think it&#039;s funny how cyclical it is - just last year it was all podcasts and Digg - now I dare say Digg has plateaued. I wonder what it will be next year.

As far as a bet - thinking back to what was in vogue back in 1997 - I think you have some evidence behind you there.

Still, there is still a ton of money to be made from these temporary rises and falls, and some of these bigger companies trying to figure out if purchasing smaller Web 2.0 ones is a smart move, if only for defensive purposes. Part of the Facebook frenzy is driven by how &lt;a href=&quot;http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/StreetPatrol/BuildingOnMySpaceSuccess.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MySpace seems to be making some good money for News Corp&lt;/a&gt;. And so the speculation expands...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think it’s funny how cyclical it is — just last year it was all podcasts and Digg — now I dare say Digg has plateaued. I wonder what it will be next year.</p>
<p>As far as a bet — thinking back to what was in vogue back in 1997 — I think you have some evidence behind you there.</p>
<p>Still, there is still a ton of money to be made from these temporary rises and falls, and some of these bigger companies trying to figure out if purchasing smaller Web 2.0 ones is a smart move, if only for defensive purposes. Part of the Facebook frenzy is driven by how <a href="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/StreetPatrol/BuildingOnMySpaceSuccess.aspx" rel="nofollow">MySpace seems to be making some good money for News Corp</a>. And so the speculation expands…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/11/03/taking-a-step-back-from-opensocial/comment-page-1/#comment-18836</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/11/03/taking-a-step-back-from-opensocial/#comment-18836</guid>
		<description>Yeah I honestly don&#039;t get it. Do people really not see that everything is temporary? HotBot dominated search for a while, then Yahoo, now it&#039;s Google. In a few years - maybe as many as 5 or 6, it&#039;ll be someone else. LiveJournal grew at a huge rate, then MySpace, now Facebook. In a few years, it&#039;ll be something else. Blogs used to be called &quot;homepages&quot;. In a few years, they&#039;ll be called something else (my guess: &quot;digital homes&quot; or something equally stupid). Pirating was BBS&#039;s, then usenet, then FTP and IRC, then Napster/gnutella, now it&#039;s bittorrent. WinPlay3, Winamp, iTunes. In a few years it&#039;ll be something else. Lynx, Netscape, IE, Firefox - in a few years.. They&#039;re all just fads - some last longer than others. If anyone wants to make a long term bet, I&#039;d be happy to put down money on this one - 10 years from now, Facebook won&#039;t have as many users as it does now - if it even exists at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I honestly don’t get it. Do people really not see that everything is temporary? HotBot dominated search for a while, then Yahoo, now it’s Google. In a few years — maybe as many as 5 or 6, it’ll be someone else. LiveJournal grew at a huge rate, then MySpace, now Facebook. In a few years, it’ll be something else. Blogs used to be called “homepages”. In a few years, they’ll be called something else (my guess: “digital homes” or something equally stupid). Pirating was BBS’s, then usenet, then FTP and IRC, then Napster/gnutella, now it’s bittorrent. WinPlay3, Winamp, iTunes. In a few years it’ll be something else. Lynx, Netscape, IE, Firefox — in a few years.. They’re all just fads — some last longer than others. If anyone wants to make a long term bet, I’d be happy to put down money on this one — 10 years from now, Facebook won’t have as many users as it does now — if it even exists at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

