<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google PageRank Gripes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/10/24/google-pagerank-gripes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/10/24/google-pagerank-gripes/</link>
	<description>Entertainment and Tech Digest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urbanist</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/10/24/google-pagerank-gripes/comment-page-1/#comment-18680</link>
		<dc:creator>Urbanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/10/24/google-pagerank-gripes/#comment-18680</guid>
		<description>Techipedia is down to 4 ... why? I don&#039;t think Tamar is selling links lol. And Neatorama? Are you kidding me? That site has tons of backlinks and a huge audience, a PR4 is just misleading, and all because they sold a few links. The punishment doesn&#039;t seem to fit the &#039;crime&#039; in a lot of these cases ... a few small sold links and a site gets demoted to the level of a n00b blog. Bleh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Techipedia is down to 4 … why? I don’t think Tamar is selling links lol. And Neatorama? Are you kidding me? That site has tons of backlinks and a huge audience, a PR4 is just misleading, and all because they sold a few links. The punishment doesn’t seem to fit the ‘crime’ in a lot of these cases … a few small sold links and a site gets demoted to the level of a n00b blog. Bleh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/10/24/google-pagerank-gripes/comment-page-1/#comment-18589</link>
		<dc:creator>webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/10/24/google-pagerank-gripes/#comment-18589</guid>
		<description>Yeah - the more I read about exactly who was penalized it is looking kind of excessive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah — the more I read about exactly who was penalized it is looking kind of excessive…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urbanist</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/10/24/google-pagerank-gripes/comment-page-1/#comment-18578</link>
		<dc:creator>Urbanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/10/24/google-pagerank-gripes/#comment-18578</guid>
		<description>What I can&#039;t believe is that OneMansBlog just dropped to PR5 from PR8. Not only does John (the blog&#039;s author) know Matt Cutts personally but he even (at Matt&#039;s personal request) removed the paid links he used to have on the site. I could understand drops of one point as a warning, but so many sites seem to have lost two or (in John&#039;s case) even three. That seems extreme, especially in cases where people have fixed the linking problems. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I can’t believe is that OneMansBlog just dropped to PR5 from PR8. Not only does John (the blog’s author) know Matt Cutts personally but he even (at Matt’s personal request) removed the paid links he used to have on the site. I could understand drops of one point as a warning, but so many sites seem to have lost two or (in John’s case) even three. That seems extreme, especially in cases where people have fixed the linking problems. <img src='http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/10/24/google-pagerank-gripes/comment-page-1/#comment-18563</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/10/24/google-pagerank-gripes/#comment-18563</guid>
		<description>Yahoo which I swear used to be a 9 (raised some eyebrows there) is now a 10.

Fanpop holds at 5 -- so you&#039;re in good company :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo which I swear used to be a 9 (raised some eyebrows there) is now a 10.</p>
<p>Fanpop holds at 5 — so you’re in good company <img src='http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tunequest</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/10/24/google-pagerank-gripes/comment-page-1/#comment-18549</link>
		<dc:creator>tunequest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/10/24/google-pagerank-gripes/#comment-18549</guid>
		<description>I noticed yesterday that apple.com/dotmac/ is PR10, while regular apple.com is PR9. 

Had to raise my eyebrow at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed yesterday that apple.com/dotmac/ is PR10, while regular apple.com is PR9. </p>
<p>Had to raise my eyebrow at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

