Facebook, Facebook, Facebook
September 26th, 2007
Unsubstantiated rumor says that Microsoft is considering a large investment in Facebook that would put the value of the Web 2.0 social networking darling north of $10 billion. Any company is worth whatever someone will pay for it, but I’ll play the game of opining whether or not Facebook is “worth” that pile of clams:
Pro Facebook:
- The Facebook buzz is nuts. Last year was YouTube, YouTube, YouTube, this it’s Facebook, Facebook, Facebook.
- Compared to YouTube, Facebook has utility and productivity potential.
- A micro-economy is forming around Facebook, just as one sprang up around eBay.
- It’s closer to the web-centric, frictionless money making system of Google. Meaning, there aren’t any physical products being sold, or huge bandwidth fees serving up video like YouTube. Facebook is all about the data – information.
- After the Web 1.0 implosion only a handful Internet companies emerged unscathed – but those that did saw their fortunes soar. I’m talking about eBay, Amazon, Yahoo! and Google. Survival meant a chance to flourish. Very few thought Google and their IPO would succeed to the point where it is now. If there is a recession and downturn for Web 2.0, the leader is Facebook. All the other leading Web 2.0 companies (flickr, YouTube, MySpace – have already been acquired).
Nay Facebook:
- How exactly the site will make money is still an open question.
- No offense, but the company is run by a pretty young guy (although that didn’t stop Microsoft or Apple).
- Does Facebook have mainstream appeal? It proved its worth with the college set, but I’m not sure if I ever see my mom signing up for Facebook (wheras many oldsters get YouTube).
- Could this be AOL redux? Remember the merger of AOL and Time / Warner. Any company that tries to swallow Facebook at tens of billions might regret that decision.
Yahoo!, Microsoft, or Google
I think Yahoo! is under other pressures that will ultimately keep them from purchasing Facebook. Yahoo! was rumored to buy Facebook for $1 billion just last year (didn’t do it) supposedly failed to acquire YouTube because they weren’t moving fast enough. So I don’t think Yahoo! is in the running for Facebook.
Facebook could very well go it alone, IPO, and attempt to be the next Google post 2.0. But I’m thinking Google or Microsoft don’t really want that to happen.
So I see three ways this will go:
- Google will try to make a go at building their own social network, meanwhile Microsoft will purchase Facebook – and so completely screw up the acquisition that Facebook will drag the company down – AOL redux, and in a few years people will wonder why Microsoft paid so much. Meanwhile, Google gains traction with their own social network plans.
- Google will try to make a go at building their own social network, which won’t gain traction – so Google makes an offer for Facebook so insane that people will shake their heads in disbelief. Google will integrate Facebook decently in one more push towards Google domination.
- Facebook sticks it out alone, barely survives the downturn, goes IPO – and sometime around 2017, purchases Yahoo!.
Yeah I’m probably a little nuts with that last point, but back in 1997 did you *really* think Google would be where it is today?