Bloggers Code Of Conduct: Thanks, But No Thanks
I can’t resist posting about this Blogger’s Code of Conduct that has just been drafted. I think the sudden attention is because of a New York Times article that has again brought this subject to the forefront (about a week too late, again showing how the mainstream media is behind the blogosphere) after it’s been hashed to death by others and even myself on this blog. I wrote all I have to offer in that post about why I won’t sign on to a Blogger’s Code of Conduct, but here’s the short points:
- So many blogs out there and bloggers blogging for different reasons. An additional thought: the code of conduct seeks to limit comments. The vast majority of blogs are in the opposite boat (mine) trying to encourage comments.
- I blog as a hobby. This is not a professional organization attempting to be the next newspaper.
- Who the heck would enforce said code of conduct?
- Why make it harder for people to start blogging?
In addition, pretty much every blogger I respect is saying this code of conduct is something they won’t get on board with, for various reasons:
- Mike Arrington of TechCrunch says he doesn’t want to turn off anonymous comments, and the code of conduct scares him more.
- Robert Scoble doesn’t want to give up on anonymous comments, either.
- Jeff Jarvis says it misses part of the point of the Internet, and sets up a false situation where you’re on one side or the other - big media has pledges and the blogosphere doesn’t, so the blogosphere must be bad.
- Mathew Ingram says it succinctly: Well-meaning, but dumb.
- Jim Kurkal calls the quest for honor through badges a wild goose chase.
- Tony Hung points out this should just a matter of a blog’s comments policy (this is all I’m going to do, too - adjust my comments policy).
- WinExtra (ever the realist) considers this policy as living in a dream world.
- Baron VC compares it to FBI warnings on DVDs.
- Eric Berlin says it’s “Lame-zor”.
This list pretty much sums it up for me.
Let me add, I support bloggers in doing anything they want with their own blog - turn off comments, require registration, make people sign a contract before they post comments, whatever. It’s just when you think your solution fits all blogs and if they don’t sign onto it, they should have a firecracker badge saying their blogs are somehow dangerous - that irks me.
And as for Webomatica? All I’m going to do in this regard is spell out my comments policy a bit more clearly, and here’s a thought - write content that encourages positive comments.
Previous Post:
Add New Comment
Viewing 8 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks