Bloggers Code Of Conduct: Thanks, But No Thanks

April 9th, 2007

BlogsI can’t resist posting about this Blogger’s Code of Conduct that has just been drafted. I think the sudden attention is because of a New York Times article that has again brought this subject to the forefront (about a week too late, again showing how the mainstream media is behind the blogosphere) after it’s been hashed to death by others and even myself on this blog. I wrote all I have to offer in that post about why I won’t sign on to a Blogger’s Code of Conduct, but here’s the short points:

  • So many blogs out there and bloggers blogging for different reasons. An additional thought: the code of conduct seeks to limit comments. The vast majority of blogs are in the opposite boat (mine) trying to encourage comments.
  • I blog as a hobby. This is not a professional organization attempting to be the next newspaper.
  • Who the heck would enforce said code of conduct?
  • Why make it harder for people to start blogging?

In addition, pretty much every blogger I respect is saying this code of conduct is something they won’t get on board with, for various reasons:

This list pretty much sums it up for me.

Let me add, I support bloggers in doing anything they want with their own blog - turn off comments, require registration, make people sign a contract before they post comments, whatever. It’s just when you think your solution fits all blogs and if they don’t sign onto it, they should have a firecracker badge saying their blogs are somehow dangerous - that irks me.

And as for Webomatica? All I’m going to do in this regard is spell out my comments policy a bit more clearly, and here’s a thought - write content that encourages positive comments.

RSS Feed Please subscribe to the Webomatica RSS Feed!

Viewing 8 Comments

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus