<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USAToday: Anti-Social Readers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/03/05/usatoday-anti-social-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/03/05/usatoday-anti-social-readers/</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews, iPhone App Reviews, and Tech Commentary by Jason Kaneshiro</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:51:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Another Step Back From Web 2.0 &#187; Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/03/05/usatoday-anti-social-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-3748</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Step Back From Web 2.0 &#187; Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/03/05/usatoday-anti-social-readers/#comment-3748</guid>
		<description>[...] a previous post regarding the USAToday redesign I wondered whether the vast majority of the mainstream had any interest in getting social on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a previous post regarding the USAToday redesign I wondered whether the vast majority of the mainstream had any interest in getting social on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/03/05/usatoday-anti-social-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-3659</link>
		<dc:creator>webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/03/05/usatoday-anti-social-readers/#comment-3659</guid>
		<description>True, Bryce. I was thinking maybe part of the success of MySpace and FaceBook is what you mention - the target users are people with lots of free time and energy. Even me, someone who is into the technology only has time for maybe 2 or 3 of these social sites - in addition to this hapless blog of course!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, Bryce. I was thinking maybe part of the success of MySpace and FaceBook is what you mention &#8211; the target users are people with lots of free time and energy. Even me, someone who is into the technology only has time for maybe 2 or 3 of these social sites &#8211; in addition to this hapless blog of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/03/05/usatoday-anti-social-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-3655</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/03/05/usatoday-anti-social-readers/#comment-3655</guid>
		<description>This seems like a common trend.  The people who make sites forget they aren&#039;t typical users of the sites they make.  Web 2.0 is great for those on the bleeding edge (such as teenagers with too much time on their hands, as evidenced by Digg and Slashdot), but does your mom get it?  Probably not.  Web 2.0 is still in beta (or gamma, perhaps) and probably isn&#039;t ready for a site like USA Today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a common trend.  The people who make sites forget they aren&#8217;t typical users of the sites they make.  Web 2.0 is great for those on the bleeding edge (such as teenagers with too much time on their hands, as evidenced by Digg and Slashdot), but does your mom get it?  Probably not.  Web 2.0 is still in beta (or gamma, perhaps) and probably isn&#8217;t ready for a site like USA Today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
