The Future Of Computing: Brains In A Jar?
We had two power outages and an earthquake last night, leading me to write this odd post, largely off line in a text editor. Apologies in advance.
I remember my first year of graduate school back in 1995, debating some peers whether the future of humanity meant getting progressively more wired into computers and the Internet, ending up as “brains in a jar” - essentially lying on a bed, totally sedentary, experiencing “life” online, through a sensory interface like a helmet or a brain implant - something like The Matrix. It’s kind of a funny thought, and so when I see technology like this (some kind of computer helmet that claims to read brain patterns), I chuckle.
While I find this humorous, there’s certainly evidence of people getting progressively more dependent on the wired world in subtler ways. Trivial information - the stuff I probably should remember but choose not to - is increasingly delegated to the net. For example, why remember exact street directions to anywhere when I can always fire up Google Maps? Why remember anybody’s phone number when I can just check my cell phone or iPod? Why remember the order of the Presidents when I can just “Google” it?
Sometimes I’m talking with someone (in the real world), and the conversation ends with - that reminds me of some article online, but I can’t remember exactly what - I’ll send you a link, later. I sometimes feel like a brain-dead terminal where the memory portion is online. The worst feeling is when I find myself in live conversation, regurgitating something I wrote on this blog - and communicated that concept better there, in digital form, than I can muster up with my own voice.
Where might these trends lead? I’m pretty certain that as computer memory prices continue to fall, eventually we’ll have a device that records everything we experience. Imagine recording all the audio and visual information you experience during a day. Then at week’s end you could review the highlights (hopefully there will some awesome search technology to do this). We’d no longer have remember anything anybody specifically said to us as we could review it later - basically being perpetually stupid, with our whole lives shoved in some database for later, where we can “Google” it.
Second, beyond voice recognition, I’d love to have a computer that could anticipate my needs before I even know what they are. One that observes my routine tasks (such as checking email or viewing certain web sites), notes the time of day, finds a pattern, and then asks me if I want this to be done on a recurring basis? This would be as good as mind-reading, and a big help to our increasingly stupid, memory-less existences (do I like Swiss cheese or cheddar on my sandwich? Oh yeah, my “iBrain” is telling me I like Swiss).
I also see further segmenting of society. You’ll get folks who want to go the brain in the jar route, progressively spending more and more time online, getting fatter and more passive by the year - consider today’s couch potatoes who are obsessed with television and just extrapolate that forward with ever more realistic entertainment like World of Warcraft and Second Life.
And certainly, there will be the non-wired, probably everyone over thirty that doesn’t “get” the increasingly pervasive and intrusive technology and resists it. I see this happening now, as I kind of scratch my head at why a six year old needs a cell phone. I don’t “text”, “IM”, or meet people through MySpace (yes, I do obsessively keep this blog, but even I have limits!). But I do remember the days of the 56K modem gosh darnit (today’s equivalent of walking three miles to school in the snow).
I can see a future in 2032 where I stare at a flat panel monitor and mouse, griping that it’s good enough, while my grandkids try to convert me to the cranial implant, contact lens monitor, and iMemory Virtual Life couch. These future children, when not online, will only able to do the most basic of tasks - eating, sleeing, and going to the bathroom.
However at that point, I’ll likely be completely stupid myself, unable to remember why I protest so much… without consulting this blog post in holographic form.
Note: In an effort to avoid a potential future as a brain in a jar, I’m limiting myself to three posts a day from here on out.
Previous Post:
Add New Comment
Viewing 3 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)
May 21, 2007 at 2:56 pm
[...] [ESSAY] The Future Of Computing: Brains In A Jar? (webomatica.com) [...]