<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wired: Brainstorming Some Social Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/12/13/wired-brainstorming-some-social-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/12/13/wired-brainstorming-some-social-stuff/</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews, iPhone App Reviews, and Tech Commentary by Jason Kaneshiro</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:43:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch UK And Blogging &#187; Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/12/13/wired-brainstorming-some-social-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch UK And Blogging &#187; Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/12/13/wired-brainstorming-some-social-stuff/#comment-814</guid>
		<description>[...] Except in the cases of obviously inflammatory, slanderous writing, or spam, I don&#8217;t think any of these are the right approach. After all, what is the point of a blog if there can&#8217;t be an open debate about what&#8217;s written on it? That type of blog would be no different than the newspaper sites I get frustrated with. Ultimately, to deny the opinions of the writers and readers would make for boring reading, and is against the whole &#8220;open conversation&#8221; thing many social sites are striving for. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Except in the cases of obviously inflammatory, slanderous writing, or spam, I don&#8217;t think any of these are the right approach. After all, what is the point of a blog if there can&#8217;t be an open debate about what&#8217;s written on it? That type of blog would be no different than the newspaper sites I get frustrated with. Ultimately, to deny the opinions of the writers and readers would make for boring reading, and is against the whole &#8220;open conversation&#8221; thing many social sites are striving for. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
