<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wired: Brainstorming Some Social Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/12/13/wired-brainstorming-some-social-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/12/13/wired-brainstorming-some-social-stuff/</link>
	<description>Entertainment and Tech Digest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch UK And Blogging &#187; Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/12/13/wired-brainstorming-some-social-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch UK And Blogging &#187; Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/12/13/wired-brainstorming-some-social-stuff/#comment-814</guid>
		<description>[...] Except in the cases of obviously inflammatory, slanderous writing, or spam, I don&#8217;t think any of these are the right approach. After all, what is the point of a blog if there can&#8217;t be an open debate about what&#8217;s written on it? That type of blog would be no different than the newspaper sites I get frustrated with. Ultimately, to deny the opinions of the writers and readers would make for boring reading, and is against the whole &#8220;open conversation&#8221; thing many social sites are striving for. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Except in the cases of obviously inflammatory, slanderous writing, or spam, I don’t think any of these are the right approach. After all, what is the point of a blog if there can’t be an open debate about what’s written on it? That type of blog would be no different than the newspaper sites I get frustrated with. Ultimately, to deny the opinions of the writers and readers would make for boring reading, and is against the whole “open conversation” thing many social sites are striving for. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

