Webomatica

 

Movie Notes: Dr. No

November 26th, 2006

Dr. No

starstarstarstar = 4 stars

Starring Sean Connery, Ursula Andress
Directed by Terence Young

Sean Connery (James Bond)

Sean Connery (James Bond)

Ursula Andress (Honey Ryder)

Ursula Andress (Honey Ryder)

My quest to watch all the James Bond films continues, and Dr. No was the first, starring a young Sean Connery who is a bit rough around the edges and looks almost thuggish. But the main elements are in place and it’s a bit stunning to see that much of what people expect from a Bond film today, was present right out of the gate back in 1962.

We start with a hit on a British agent John Strangways in Jamaica. Bond is sent to investigate the relationship between this murder and disruptions to the American space program at nearby Cape Canaveral. Bond realizes that both the both events are linked to a secret hideout built by the mysterious Dr. No. Bond eventually solves the mystery and along the way risks his life and finds some downtime with beautiful women.

Around this plot hang the various Bond elements we all know and love: The gun-barrel opening sequence, the surf-guitar theme, Bond in a casino playing games with Sylvia Trench (Eunice Gayson – who makes a brief appearance in From Russia With Love), an exotic location in the form of Jamaica, a car chase, several brushes with death, a truly hot Bond babe Honey Ryder (Ursula Andress), and the nefarious villain Dr. No with plans for world domination. The only items missing are the Bond gadgets, a pre-title action sequence, and a post-ending action sequence where Bond must dispatch some leftover evil henchmen.

Still, many sequences in Dr. No are so classic that they are directly mimicked in other films: Honey Ryder emerging from the water in a bikini, Bond trapped in a tube, a secret hideout being blown to smithereens, and Bond letting a tow line go so he and his new found love can have some privacy in a row boat.
The only negative aspect of this film is the actor playing Dr. No (Joseph Wiseman) is obviously not Chinese, nor does he really get to use his metal hands. There is also one woman in particular who I think is supposed to be Asian but looks more like a pale girl in a dark-haired wig.

Other than that, Dr. No is a respectable Bond adventure (if a bit slow at times), and as I’ve already noted, a surprising amount of it echoes through the plots of the other films. It seems that with such a firm foundation, the only way to make better sequels were bigger budgets and more explosions – a thankfully easy route to follow. You don’t mess with a winning formula.

IMDB: Dr. No
Wikipedia: Dr. No
Rotten Tomatoes: Dr. No

Next Bond Movie: From Russia With Love

RSS Feed Please subscribe to the Webomatica RSS Feed!

  • I cried like mad when I left Jamaica to get chocolate, i loved it there. We rode hosres on the beach and I met my husband there.
  • Slammerworm
    Absolutely agree. This is the purest statement of movie-form Bond, and everything else derives from here. Seems like the Bond movies which 'reset' away from encrustations of doodads and gimmickery to a simple, character-driven plot and believable action (eg On Her Majesty's Secret Service, the latest version of Casino Royale etc) use this as a point zero. They're also the best movies. Unfortunately, even here there's just a little bit of that naggingly ubiquitous Bond script racism: check the unfeasibly abandoned dancing by one or two of the native Jamaicans. It's up there with the 'hopping' Chinese soldiers in Goldfinger.
  • annoymously genius
    What?! That's my reaction to Dr. No, which was a very mixed bag. Connery blew the opening "Bond, James Bond" when he muttered it out of his cigar, not to mention once Ursulla Andress was out of the bikini and her hair was dry, she was nowhere nearly as attractive as the other bond girls. Connery was also too young for the role. He looked a little depleted.
    On the plus side, it was entertaining to see Connery crawl in the big vents, getting very dirty in the process.
    So in the end, I would actually would give this a bad review. Although some of it's successors were much worse, this was one of the lamer bond movies.
blog comments powered by Disqus