<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Boom Time Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/10/27/is-it-boom-time-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/10/27/is-it-boom-time-again/</link>
	<description>Entertainment and Tech Digest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How YouTube Is Already Inflating Web 2.0 &#187; Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/10/27/is-it-boom-time-again/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>How YouTube Is Already Inflating Web 2.0 &#187; Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 01:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/10/27/is-it-boom-time-again/#comment-511</guid>
		<description>[...] It seems the price is inferred based on the $1.6 billion that was spent by Google to acquire YouTube. There isn&#8217;t even any question anymore whether that amount was too much. It just &#8220;is.&#8221; And some say $200 million for MetaCafe is a &#8220;steal&#8221;. So as I predicted earlier, the YouTube sale is already being used as a benchmark vindicating the valuations of many current Web 2.0 start ups. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] It seems the price is inferred based on the $1.6 billion that was spent by Google to acquire YouTube. There isn’t even any question anymore whether that amount was too much. It just “is.” And some say $200 million for MetaCafe is a “steal”. So as I predicted earlier, the YouTube sale is already being used as a benchmark vindicating the valuations of many current Web 2.0 start ups. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Very Bubble Web 2.0, Web 3.0 Article &#187; Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/10/27/is-it-boom-time-again/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Very Bubble Web 2.0, Web 3.0 Article &#187; Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/10/27/is-it-boom-time-again/#comment-450</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s some great reading for a post-Thanksgiving, Monday morning food hangover. If you were looking for more evidence that we&#8217;re in another .com bubble (something I&#8217;ve been predicting for a while), here it is. The article makes many points which are totally hype and ridiculous, if you think about them with any semblance of objectivity. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Here’s some great reading for a post-Thanksgiving, Monday morning food hangover. If you were looking for more evidence that we’re in another .com bubble (something I’ve been predicting for a while), here it is. The article makes many points which are totally hype and ridiculous, if you think about them with any semblance of objectivity. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

